Website powered by

Revit Furniture Families

I created a small furniture library based on the most common pieces I could find around my home. I chose items that are familiar, functional and easy to recognise in both domestic and commercial interiors: a bedside cabinet, a dresser, a desk, single- and double-door wardrobes, and kitchen cabinets.
I began with the drawer, because it is one of the most reusable parts of domestic furniture. Rather than modelling each piece separately, I built the drawer as a component system with nested parts: handles, rollers, slides, drawer boxes, and front panels.
After completing the drawer-based furniture, I moved on to wardrobes and kitchen cabinetry. This required a second layer of modelling: not only drawers, but also door leaves, hinges and internal storage components.
I modelled a concealed hinge based on a typical European cabinet hinge arrangement. Modern concealed hinges usually use a 35 mm cup, allow three-way adjustment, and open through a wide angle, which makes them ideal for clean, contemporary cabinetry. I also created a hanging rail as a face-based family with adjustable length, so it could be reused in different wardrobes.
For the doors, I built two main leaf types: a solid leaf with curved sides, and a framed leaf with a glass centre. Both versions included hinge cup cut-outs, handle placement and editable dimensions. I then combined these into a single door family with visibility controls, before adding an opening mechanism so the door could rotate around the hinge axis.
For desks, I followed ergonomic guidance rather than forcing a fixed “design” height. HSE guidance states that the desktop should allow the elbow to sit just below the surface, which is a more useful rule than using a single rigid dimension for every user.
For kitchen worktops, I used the common standing work surface logic: a practical height around 900 mm, adjusted to the user and task. This is consistent with the dimensions used in mainstream kitchen systems and ergonomic planning guides.
I also standardised fittings around the 32 mm system where relevant, because that is a common reference line in furniture hardware and fittings. It helped keep the model buildable and easier to parameterise.

I developed a parametric desk and side bed, designed to be fully adjustable through controlled parameters.

A fully parametric closet family where geometry, materials, and internal components are controlled through parameters.

I created four handle types as face-based families, with adjustable material, length and visibility options.

I created four handle types as face-based families, with adjustable material, length and visibility options.

I also modelled the roller and both the stable and movable slide elements, using revolve, sweep and extrusion tools.

I also modelled the roller and both the stable and movable slide elements, using revolve, sweep and extrusion tools.

The drawer box itself was developed in two versions: an inset type and an overlay type, each with editable width, depth, height, face material and internal material.

The drawer box itself was developed in two versions: an inset type and an overlay type, each with editable width, depth, height, face material and internal material.

The bedside cabinet used a single inset drawer with a curved handle.

The bedside cabinet used a single inset drawer with a curved handle.

The dresser used multiple drawers with paired handles and a taller storage layout.

The dresser used multiple drawers with paired handles and a taller storage layout.

The desk used two smaller drawers positioned at the upper corner, with the drawer width constrained to one-third of the overall desk width.

The desk used two smaller drawers positioned at the upper corner, with the drawer width constrained to one-third of the overall desk width.

The single-door wardrobe combines two curved-front drawers, a hinged door, a hanging rail and a shelf.

The single-door wardrobe combines two curved-front drawers, a hinged door, a hanging rail and a shelf.

A single and a double-door version.

A single and a double-door version.

The wardrobe proportions were based on common modular storage systems rather than arbitrary dimensions.

The wardrobe proportions were based on common modular storage systems rather than arbitrary dimensions.

created separate wall cabinet and base cabinet families, again using the same approach: clean geometry, consistent hardware, and adjustable parameters.

created separate wall cabinet and base cabinet families, again using the same approach: clean geometry, consistent hardware, and adjustable parameters.